Okay, I'm going to break my traditional & informal style for a more formal post...... this is odd.
I just finished reading Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. It is by far one of my favorite books. This is going to be a book that I'll probably read every few years or so--just like the Harry Potter books. I read the 1,200 pages of Atlas Shrugged spread across my trips to Virginia, San Francisco, and Las Vegas, and I recently completed it in my spare time at home.
Atlas Shrugged is a book depicting the normal operations of a functioning society not unlike ours as it devolves into an anarchy ridden dystopia. Unlike 1984 or Brave New World (which I am currently reading) it does not begin in a dystopia. (I can vividly remember classmates commenting that the world of 1984 is completely impossible and were wondering why we were reading it) I think that this, over anything else, is what really made this book for me. It gave a good reinforcement that at any time the government could head that way---if it isn't already.
Anyway, what do I think of Atlas Shrugged, John Galt, and Objectivism politically?
I hate it.
Sure, as a concept, Objectivism sounds pretty cool. But, in the real world, it would never work. Why not? (If you havent gotten the idea yet, there will be spoilers ahead.)
The biggest thing is that the world needs poor people. Not in the idea that we need people to suffer, but we need people to work hard, starting from zero and working to the top.
But Atlas Shrugged also shows us why the current state we're in isn't any better:
We can't have poor people who feel entitled to do nothing but draw from the welfare state. That won't progress them any further in life. We need poor people to work their asses off. To make an extremely objectivist statement--they need to only use the money they earn. The easiest way to stop this is to cut off welfare so the poor can get up and work their way into the middle class. This is incredibly possible. It isn't hard to get up and work, but it certainly is once you get adjusted to the "silver platter" lifestyle. Melt the silver platters.
To give poor people credit, this isn't their fault at all. It's the government's. The government seizes the money that the poor would (in a functional free market society) and redistributes it freely to the poor people, who don't have to work for it. And if they want to work, they'll get a minimum wage job that pays less than welfare. It's completely discouraging. Basically, the poor never will break out of their low standing in this fashion.
Hm, I'm not quite sure how I managed to get into this rant, but after reading it, I figure I'll keep it.
Anyway, consider this as a sign that I'm going to be writing more in the coming weeks.
-A
___________
Extra special thanks to my good (and super conservative) friend Jack for helping me understand some things in the book.